Journals & Clinical Evidence

Sutureless Laser Labiaplasty of Labia Minora

Curated research to understand technology benefits, comparisons, and limitations, prioritizing studies that identify devices or brands in our portfolio.

Brochures & Media Journals & Clinical Evidence Solutions by Specialty

All journals Urology Obstetrics & Gynecology Orthopedics & Pain Surgery & Proctology Respiratory & Sleep Medicine Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Dermatology & Aesthetics

Search procedures, conditions, devices, or authors

1 publication

Procedure evidence · Other devices2021 · Bizjak-Ogrinc U, Senčar S

Laser labiaplasty: satisfaction and complications in a series of 80 patients

Sutureless Laser Labiaplasty of Labia Minora
Sexual Medicine 9:100406

Retrospective · 80 patients · No control group · Satisfaction assessed around day 60

Findings: 76 patients were very satisfied and four were satisfied. Seven wound infections, one bleeding event, and one haematoma were recorded.

Points to consider: Retrospective bias, no randomised comparator, and limited follow-up. This does not establish that laser is superior to other techniques.

Device & relevance: Er:YAG 2940 nm SP Dynamis (Fotona), not biolitec. Included as procedural context; it does not establish indications or outcomes for labiaplasty with LEONARDO.

Read publication ↗Full text at publisher / repository ↗Overview link

DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100406

Sutureless Laser Labiaplasty of Labia Minora

Laser labiaplasty: satisfaction and complications in a series of 80 patients

Reading evidence in context.