SMC Global DistribusiAdvancing Care. Empowering Clinicians.
EN
Bahasa IndonesiaEnglish
Journals & Clinical Evidence

Results of the double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing laser hemorrhoidoplasty with sutured mucopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy

Curated research to understand technology benefits, comparisons, and limitations, prioritizing studies that identify devices or brands in our portfolio.

Brochures & MediaJournals & Clinical EvidenceSolutions by Specialty
All journalsUrologyObstetrics & GynecologyOrthopedics & PainSurgery & ProctologyRespiratory & Sleep MedicinePlastic & Reconstructive SurgeryDermatology & Aesthetics

1 publication

Procedure evidence2020 · Poskus T et al.

LHP, mucopexy, and excisional haemorrhoidectomy

Results of the double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing laser hemorrhoidoplasty with sutured mucopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy
International journal of colorectal disease

Randomised trial · 121 patients · Grade II–III haemorrhoids · Single centre

Findings: LHP was less painful than excision. Return to activity: 15 days after LHP, 22 after mucopexy, and 30 after excision.

Points to consider: Recurrence requiring treatment at one year: LHP 10%, mucopexy 22%, excision 0%. Recovery comfort should be considered alongside durability of results.

Device & relevance: 1470 nm diode laser; this summary does not assume equivalence across all biolitec models.

Read publication ↗Overview link

DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03460-6